Skip to main content

Money laundering, part 1

Money laundering. Part 1: A brief introduction


 The term ‘money laundering’ is defined as a way by which criminals hide and disguise the origin and ownership of the proceeds of their crimes in order to avoid the prosecution, conviction and confiscation of the criminal funds; the technique is basically adopted to change the dirty money into clean money.[1] Other explanation is that it is a system to provide false stories for money transfers in document by mapping out the scheme for money laundering and exposing the differences between the true reasons for the money transfers and the presented reasons, the criminality of purpose is laid bare.[2] Thus, money laundering is the process of disguising the origins of property which has been acquired through criminal conduct.[3]  

Traditionally, the process of money laundering consists of three stage; those are (i) placement, (ii) layering and (iii) integration.[4] At placement, attempts are made to conceal the identity of the true owner of proceeds of crime, and illegally earned cash is deposited into the banks. Scholars are of the view that this is the stage where the launderer is most likely to be traced.[5] Then, at layering,  the launderers setup number of transactions in order to confuse the audit trail and separate the money from its criminal origin, where these transactions have no particular purpose.[6] Arguably, those are the just launderers’ efforts in attempt of having control to all those proceeds which were earned in the first phase.[7] Finally, at integration, the launderers bring up the laundered money into the legitimate economy, so it appears that the money is earned legally.[8] In other words, the launderers change the form of the proceeds in order to shrink the huge volumes of cash generated by the initial activity, most probably the criminal.[9] Those three steps are also basics, which may occur separate or at the same time together, but more commonly they may overlap.[10]

Historically, the term ‘money laundering’ derived of gangster Al Capone’s funnelling ill-gotten gains, through launderettes to construct the pretence of the legitimate income; Al Capone was later prosecuted and convicted for tax evasion in 1931. [11] It is argued that this may have been the alarm to getting the money laundering business off the ground.[12] Whereas, in the legal context, money laundering made the formal appearance in the case United States v $4,255,625.39,[13] in which it was considered that there should be a cause to believe that a substantial connection exists between the property to be forfeited and the criminal activity defined by the statute.[14]

As a whole, the money laundering is a complex act in a sense that the number of definitions used for money laundering are broader, it considers all handling of money as it is derived from crime money-laundering, therefore it is complex to understand.[15] Moreover, the way the term money laundering is described, it expands as well as limits its area, it expands because the original sources do not necessarily need to be criminal, and, it limits because there is the pretence of a non-existent legitimate source.[16] From the performance point of view, it is an illegal monetary function, responds to the overall demand for black finance services, expressed by individual group that have committed income-producing crimes.[17]




[1] Janet Ulph, Commercial fraud : civil liability, human rights, and money laundering (OUP 2006) 131; Commonwealth Secretariat,  Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Second edn., London 2006) 6; Toby Graham, Evan Bell and Nicholas Elliott, Money Laundering (Butterworths LexisNexis UK  2003) 5
[2]Kenneth Murray, ‘Dismantling organised crime groups through enforcement of the POCA money laundering offences’ [2010] JMLC 11
[3]  Ulph (n1) 124
[4] Gilmore (1995) in Ping He, ‘A typological study on money laundering’, [2010] JMLC 13(1) 15; Michael Pace, ‘Does PI litigation escape the requirements of the money laundering legislation (and the Terrorism Act)?’ [2004] JPIL 254
[5] Graham, Bell and Elliott (n1) 5
[6] van Duyneet (2003) in Donatto Masciandaro, Elod Takats and Brigitte Unger, Black Finance The Economics of Money Laundering (Edward Elger, Cheltenham UK 2007) 103
[7] Billy Steel, ‘Money Laundering – The Money Laundering Process’ <http://www.laundryman.u-net.com/page4_mlproc.html> accessed 8 February 2015
[8] Graham, Bell and Elliott (n1) above 5
[9] Steel (n7)
[10] Secretariat (n1) 9
[11] Masciandaro, Takats and Unger (n6) 103
[12] Steel (n7)
[13] (1982) 551 F Supp. 314. (1982 US DIST LEXIS 15918)
[14] 762 F.2d 895, 903 (11th Cir. 1985)
[15]Petrus C Van Duyne, ‘Money-laundering: estimates in fog’ [1994] JFC 59
[16]ibid
[17] Masciandaro, Takats and Unger (n6) 1

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The six major non-corporate cases of 'Bankruptcy tourism' in the UK

 1.  Skjevesland v Geveran Trading Co Ltd (No.4) [2002] EWHC 2898 (Ch) The case was about a Swiss banker,  (1)  who had ordinary residence in the UK, because he resided there for 92 days a year; (2)  he had a flat in London to satisfy the fact that he had a place of residence in the UK;  (3) however, his 90% of the economic interests were in Switzerland.  It was held that his ‘Centre of main interest’ (COMI) is outside EU, and the Regulation was not applicable. 2. Staubitz-Schreiber, Re  (C-1/04) [2006] ECR I-701 It was upheld by the European Court of Justice that the COMI to be determined at the time when the debtor lodges a petition for insolvency proceedings and not after that. Therefore, once jurisdiction is established, it is unlikely for a debtors to change COMI.  3. Stojevic v Official Receiver [2007] BPIR 141 It was held that the principle COMI of a natural person is the place where he has his habitual residence. An indirect economic interest of the debtor
Post a Comment
Read more

Bankruptcy Tourism & UK

The term ‘bankruptcy’, defined as a procedure by which debtors obtain financial relief and undergo a judicially supervised liquidation of the debtor's assets for the benefit of creditors. It is also known as a state of a person who has been adjudged by a court to be insolvent. Then the court orders the compulsory administration of a bankrupt’s affair so that his assets can be fairly distributed among his creditors. Whereas, the term ‘Bankruptcy Tourism’ refers to a process by which both, corporation and individuals (more oftenly foreign) publicize their insolvency in the jurisdiction of their choice. [1] Alternatively, the terminology is also known as ‘forum shopping’. [2] The law of insolvency varies country wise. Because of that the debtors wish to choose the place of their choice to declare their bankruptcy aiming to take advantage of the most lenient law of insolvency. By doing so they abuse the legal system of that country and get rid of the creditors.    In particul
1 comment
Read more

Oman's oil deficit - need to diversify

The Sultanate of Oman shares borders with Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen; the country also shares marine borders with Iran and Pakistan. Geographically, it is held on the mouth of Persian Gulf; besides, the Sultanate is also the second largest territory in the Arabian Peninsula. Thus, its physical location and peaceful political situation attract to invest in Oman and offer a convenient place to enhance trade and business relations. It contrast to the excellent opportunities in trade and business. Oman is an oil rich monarchy, which heavy rely on its hydrocarbon resources, mainly oil and gas. Historically, the first ever oil discovery was made in 1956. Later, the first commercial oil discovery was achieved in 1962 and thus, the first ever export of oil cargo was made in 1967. It was accounted that by 2009, in Oman there were more than 135 oil producing fields, which rapidly reached the mark of 162 by 2013. According to the Ministry of Finance, Oman, in the year of 20
Post a Comment
Read more