1. Skjevesland v Geveran Trading Co Ltd (No.4) [2002] EWHC 2898 (Ch) The case was about a Swiss banker, (1) who had ordinary residence in the UK, because he resided there for 92 days a year; (2) he had a flat in London to satisfy the fact that he had a place of residence in the UK; (3) however, his 90% of the economic interests were in Switzerland. It was held that his ‘Centre of main interest’ (COMI) is outside EU, and the Regulation was not applicable. 2. Staubitz-Schreiber, Re (C-1/04) [2006] ECR I-701 It was upheld by the European Court of Justice that the COMI to be determined at the time when the debtor lodges a petition for insolvency proceedings and not after that. Therefore, once jurisdiction is established, it is unlikely for a debtors to change COMI. 3. Stojevic v Official Receiver [2007] BPIR 141 It was held that the principle COMI of a natural person is the place where he has his habitual resid...
To make the legal jargon understandable for everyone.