Skip to main content

Some basics of defamation, everyone should know!

1.    Defamation is a form of tort which affects the reputation of a person. For an statement to be considered as defamatory, one of the condition must be fulfilled as follows, (i) to expose the plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy; or (ii) tends to injure the plaintiff in his profession or trade; or (iii) to cause the esteem, respect, goodwill or confidence in which a person is held or to excite adverse, derogatory or unpleasant feelings or opinions against him.

2.    There are two types of defamation, those are, (i) libel; and (ii) slander. Libel is a defamation in written form. In contrast, slander is a false spoken statement to injure the reputation of other.

3.    To establish a tort of libel, three conditions must be fulfilled, those are, (I) a false statement has been made against plaintiff; (ii) it must be in any permanent form; and (iii) it has lowered the plaintiff in the esteem of others or the he is shunned by the society.

4.    To establish a tort of slander six conditions must be fulfilled, those are, (i) the statement must be defamatory; (ii) it must be false and not a fair bona fide comment; (iii) it must refer to the plaintiff; (iv) it must be published by the defendant; (v) there must be an special damage to the plaintiff.

5.    A dead person could not be subject to defamation, however, a criminal prosecution can be brought against the defendant by the relatives of the deceased, where the act of defendant to be considered as defamation, should the dead person was alive.

6.    A corporation can brought an action against defamation, it if fulfills two requirements, those are, (i) the statement is of defamatory nature, had it been directed to any individual; and (ii) the nature and tendency of the statement is to cause actual damages to the corporation with respect to its business and property.

7.    To initiate a defamation proceeding, plaintiff has to claim that a defamatory statement has been made, and he does not need to prove that the statement is wrong against him. The burden of proof is on the defendant to prove that the statement is true. Thus, truth is an absolute defense to any defamation proceeding brought against. As there is no civil proceeding in defamation, if the statement is true.

8.    There are three defenses in defamation for defendant to prove that he is right in his statement, those are, (i) justification of the statement as truth; or (ii) if the statement is a fair and bona fide comment, (there is no liability in case of bona fide comments with respect to the matters of public interests); or (iii) if the defendant keeps such a relation that, had it been written or in a verbal form against someone else, that would have been equivalent to defamation; that defense is also known as ‘privileged occasion’.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oman's oil deficit - need to diversify

The Sultanate of Oman shares borders with Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Yemen; the country also shares marine borders with Iran and Pakistan. Geographically, it is held on the mouth of Persian Gulf; besides, the Sultanate is also the second largest territory in the Arabian Peninsula. Thus, its physical location and peaceful political situation attract to invest in Oman and offer a convenient place to enhance trade and business relations. It contrast to the excellent opportunities in trade and business. Oman is an oil rich monarchy, which heavy rely on its hydrocarbon resources, mainly oil and gas. Historically, the first ever oil discovery was made in 1956. Later, the first commercial oil discovery was achieved in 1962 and thus, the first ever export of oil cargo was made in 1967. It was accounted that by 2009, in Oman there were more than 135 oil producing fields, which rapidly reached the mark of 162 by 2013. According to the Ministry of Finance, Oman, in the year of 20...
Post a Comment
Read more

Diplomatic immunity and head of states

The lack of imputation of criminal responsibility itself cannot preclude the development of international criminal responsibility. Nor in any sense it is accepted for a head of state to commit  any act in his personal capacity for personal gain or/and, as per orders received by the sending state, which leads to crime. Parallel to other perpetrators, head of states also liable under the international criminal responsibility without any defence when they face any tribunals of war against humanity. [1] For example, In the Rainbow Warrior case, it was concluded that if an action performed by a diplomatic agent in a functional capacity; and at the same time is a serious crime which breaches both, the receiving state’s national laws and the public international law. Then the diplomatic agent can be held personally liable for the actions regardless of whether they were ordered to do so by his sovereign state. [2] The official position of defendants, whether as Heads of State or ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bankruptcy Tourism & UK

The term ‘bankruptcy’, defined as a procedure by which debtors obtain financial relief and undergo a judicially supervised liquidation of the debtor's assets for the benefit of creditors. It is also known as a state of a person who has been adjudged by a court to be insolvent. Then the court orders the compulsory administration of a bankrupt’s affair so that his assets can be fairly distributed among his creditors. Whereas, the term ‘Bankruptcy Tourism’ refers to a process by which both, corporation and individuals (more oftenly foreign) publicize their insolvency in the jurisdiction of their choice. [1] Alternatively, the terminology is also known as ‘forum shopping’. [2] The law of insolvency varies country wise. Because of that the debtors wish to choose the place of their choice to declare their bankruptcy aiming to take advantage of the most lenient law of insolvency. By doing so they abuse the legal system of that country and get rid of the creditors.    In par...
1 comment
Read more